| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Lady Spank
GET OUT NASTY FACE
852
   |
Posted - 2012.01.08 04:09:00 -
[1] - Quote
Some people run low sec incursions because they enjoy the opportunity for PVP that they present. Cowards stay in high sec with the rest of the scrubs.
If you think there is too much money to be made, or too many people running them then do something different. It's rather hypocritical to complain about how much money they make when you happily run them yourself. I assume you are complaining about the ISK rewarded, your rant was pretty incoherent.
(a¦á_a¦â) ~ http://getoutnastyface.blogspot.com/ ~ (a¦á_a¦â)
-áGÖÑ New Years Resolution ~ Cease thy Smacktalk GÖÑ |
Lady Spank
GET OUT NASTY FACE
852
|
Posted - 2012.01.08 04:50:00 -
[2] - Quote
Vyl Vit wrote:met worst wrote:Lady Spank wrote:...Cowards stay in highsec... If the choice is between being a coward in highsec (and my own boss) or a sheep bleating for their supper working for an RMT lord, I know what I'd rather be. Lady Spank likes to seem tough. It's...a thing. You should see her tap her glass with an emory file. It's absolutely frightening!
It's true.
(a¦á_a¦â) ~ http://getoutnastyface.blogspot.com/ ~ (a¦á_a¦â)
-áGÖÑ New Years Resolution ~ Cease thy Smacktalk GÖÑ |
Lady Spank
GET OUT NASTY FACE
904
|
Posted - 2012.01.09 22:55:00 -
[3] - Quote
They can fund their PVP in low sec incursions, where they ought to be if they are PVPing in the first place. Defending weekend warriors is no excuse for justifying the stupid income available in high-sec.
(a¦á_a¦â) ~ http://getoutnastyface.blogspot.com/ ~ (a¦á_a¦â)
-áGÖÑ New Years Resolution ~ Cease thy Smacktalk GÖÑ |
Lady Spank
GET OUT NASTY FACE
904
|
Posted - 2012.01.09 23:07:00 -
[4] - Quote
Barakkus wrote:Lady Spank wrote:They can fund their PVP in low sec incursions, where they ought to be if they are PVPing in the first place. Defending weekend warriors is no excuse for justifying the stupid income available in high-sec. It's not just weekend warriors and you know it, unless you wanna group Brick sQuad and Noir in the weekend warrior crowd. Whether or not they're running on mains or alts, every single major alliance and corp has people running highsec incursions.
So make them worthless to these groups.
(a¦á_a¦â) ~ http://getoutnastyface.blogspot.com/ ~ (a¦á_a¦â)
-áGÖÑ New Years Resolution ~ Cease thy Smacktalk GÖÑ |
Lady Spank
GET OUT NASTY FACE
904
|
Posted - 2012.01.10 00:26:00 -
[5] - Quote
BOO HOO I DONT THINK THE CSM REPRESENT HIGH SEC SCRUBLORDS THATS THE ONLY REASON HIGH SEC IS NOT AS LUCRATIVE, I CANT ACCEPT THAT PERHAPS I AM WRONG BUT TRYING TO DELUDE MYSELF BECAUSE I AM TOO COWARDLY TO LEAVE THE TRAINING GROUNDS.
(a¦á_a¦â) ~ http://getoutnastyface.blogspot.com/ ~ (a¦á_a¦â)
-áGÖÑ New Years Resolution ~ Cease thy Smacktalk GÖÑ |
Lady Spank
GET OUT NASTY FACE
904
|
Posted - 2012.01.10 00:30:00 -
[6] - Quote
Obsidian Hawk wrote:You cannot actually run low sec incursions w/o running into goons or test.
This is completely incorrect.
(a¦á_a¦â) ~ http://getoutnastyface.blogspot.com/ ~ (a¦á_a¦â)
-áGÖÑ New Years Resolution ~ Cease thy Smacktalk GÖÑ |
Lady Spank
GET OUT NASTY FACE
904
|
Posted - 2012.01.10 00:36:00 -
[7] - Quote
Caellach Marellus wrote:Lady Spank wrote:BOO HOO I DONT THINK THE CSM REPRESENT HIGH SEC SCRUBLORDS THATS THE ONLY REASON HIGH SEC IS NOT AS LUCRATIVE, I CANT ACCEPT THAT PERHAPS I AM WRONG BUT TRYING TO DELUDE MYSELF BECAUSE I AM TOO COWARDLY TO LEAVE THE TRAINING GROUNDS. They don't represent anyone other than nullbear empires. Remember wanting to nerf ABC mining in Wormholes because they didn't know they were 0.0 regions? Just because you like to troll in caps with terribly thin veiled insults doesn't make your argument right. People don't all want to play a small group's idea of EVE, deal with it.
If you look at their agenda's you will see how small minded your comment is. Most of the people I see crying about how unfair the CSM is are irrelevant high-sec risk averse whiners that think farming incursions, avoiding wardecs and mining in peace are the most important issues. Maybe you don't feel represented because you are completely out of touch with the grand scope of the game. The mineral removal in wormhole space was primarily to limit the ease with which systems could become impenetrable fortresses.
Quote:Some of them don't even run the incursions in their own sov. You fly through a week after they're established and still at full penalties. Perhaps they aren't interested in Incursions.
(a¦á_a¦â) ~ http://getoutnastyface.blogspot.com/ ~ (a¦á_a¦â)
-áGÖÑ New Years Resolution ~ Cease thy Smacktalk GÖÑ |
Lady Spank
GET OUT NASTY FACE
904
|
Posted - 2012.01.10 00:37:00 -
[8] - Quote
DarthNefarius wrote:Lady Spank wrote:Obsidian Hawk wrote:You cannot actually run low sec incursions w/o running into goons or test. This is completely incorrect. Go check it out when a lo sec incursion is falling in influence zoom over there & see for yourself who is there.
Last few times I did it it was me, I'm not a goon or testie.
(a¦á_a¦â) ~ http://getoutnastyface.blogspot.com/ ~ (a¦á_a¦â)
-áGÖÑ New Years Resolution ~ Cease thy Smacktalk GÖÑ |
Lady Spank
GET OUT NASTY FACE
906
|
Posted - 2012.01.10 04:08:00 -
[9] - Quote
Endeavour Starfleet wrote:Alina Wize wrote:Do you guys even listen to what the csm says about incursions? The current csm loves incursions and wants ccp to implement more pve content like it.
This thread is full of tinfoil. Show proof. Show me proof that CSM has stated that they want incursions to be anything but nerfed. Nerf statements include. "OMG rebalance vanguards!" "Less Incursions in hisec" "Force players into other types of incursions" "Make incursions more a threat to logis" "Tweaks to incursions" etc..
Evidently you are a horribly uninformed rumor monger that expects everyone else to PROVE you wrong, which is a joke because readhing through here it's obvious you aren't worth dignifying with any kind of reasoned discussion. How about you get a clue then we can take the discussion from there.
(a¦á_a¦â) ~ http://getoutnastyface.blogspot.com/ ~ (a¦á_a¦â)
-áGÖÑ New Years Resolution ~ Cease thy Smacktalk GÖÑ |
Lady Spank
GET OUT NASTY FACE
944
|
Posted - 2012.01.11 22:03:00 -
[10] - Quote
Hainnz wrote:I don't care about incursions one way or the other, but thinking about it, this game lives and dies with High Sec. If you squeeze players out of High Sec, you are more likely to squeeze them out of the game and not into low or hull sec.
IMO, make High Sec more fun, not less. A better game experience in High Sec means more people playing this game which in turn means more people out in Low and Null blowing each other up.
I agree, and here is how to make high sec more fun...
1. Remove Concord
2. Remove invulnerability to wardecs
4. Reduce income per hour from incursions to 30% of present figures
3. Add more exploration type content
suitably beef up rewards in low sec to match the new fun available in high-sec.
(a¦á_a¦â) ~ http://getoutnastyface.blogspot.com/ ~ (a¦á_a¦â)
-áGÖÑ New Years Resolution ~ Cease thy Smacktalk GÖÑ |
Lady Spank
Genos Occidere
HYDRA RELOADED
957
|
Posted - 2012.01.13 04:10:00 -
[11] - Quote
Andski wrote:Marlona Sky wrote:Andski wrote:fhc poster marlona sky, ladies and gentlemen I'm flattered you keep following my every word in every post on every forum, but it is kinda creepy.  i just saw a few bad posts and i realized you're bad at posting
It normally just takes one post.
(a¦á_a¦â) ~ http://getoutnastyface.blogspot.com/ ~ (a¦á_a¦â)
-áGÖÑ New Years Resolution ~ Cease thy Smacktalk GÖÑ |
Lady Spank
Genos Occidere
HYDRA RELOADED
1133
|
Posted - 2012.01.21 11:30:00 -
[12] - Quote
Summon the chivalry!
(a¦á_a¦â) ~ http://getoutnastyface.blogspot.com/ ~ (a¦á_a¦â) |
Lady Spank
Genos Occidere
HYDRA RELOADED
1133
|
Posted - 2012.01.21 12:33:00 -
[13] - Quote
CCP should not pander to bots so you shouldn't get special treatment for actively playing.
(a¦á_a¦â) ~ http://getoutnastyface.blogspot.com/ ~ (a¦á_a¦â) |
| |
|